|
James
Sallis on
Chester Himes
at Edinburgh International Book Festival
18th August 2000
Ravi
Bali
Chester
Himes was one of the first crime fiction writers who managed to
convincingly articulate the experience of being black and living
in America.
He
is in many ways a writers' writer, regarded as fine a craftsman
of mood, character and story as Raymond Chandler or Dasheill Hammett,
though he never achieved their level of popularity. Through his
central characters he was able to convey a sense of the pent-up
rage that black people, particularly black men, felt about living
in a racist America where their dignity was continually undermined.
His books (particularly the three detective novels that make up
The Harlem Cycle) have enjoyed a certain level of popularity in
Britain, and Europe more broadly, while inexplicably being neglected
in the country where he was born and where all his stories were
set.
Unfortunately,
in this talk James Sallis, who has just written a major biography
of Himes, was quite candid that he had not been able to account
for this disparity in how the book was received. He did give some
of the details of Himes' life, the early part of which was spent
in prison where he started his writing. In his whole life he hardly
made any money from his books, most of which were printed as cheap
pulp editions, and only much later, when he got the royalties from
film scripts based on his novels, was he able to support himself
through his writing.
Himes
makes a good subject for biography because he was such a fantasist,
in that the line between the confessed facts of his life and his
written fiction is blurred. He gave details of his life that were
not true, while on the other hand his novels contained scenes that
clearly reflected his direct experience. It is the complex interweaving
of these elements of fact and fantasy that Sallis explains he was
trying to unravel in his new book on Himes.
The
sociological explanation of why Himes was so differently received
in the land of his birth does not lie in his emigration to Europe,
because there are other black American writers who established their
popularity on both sides of the Atlantic despite not living in the
States. The answer to why Himes' work has not entered into the canon
of American popular fiction is a theorisation which will have to
wait for another day; and perhaps for a writer other than Sallis.
It is a shame that Himes never got the level of recognition he deserved,
but hopefully this biography will help to increase appreciation
of him as the very fine writer he was.
|