|

|
click
above to buy this book from Amazon.co.uk
|
|
Desmond
Morris on
The Naked Eye
at Edinburgh
International Book Festival
15th August 2000
Ravi
Bali
The
latest book from Desmond Morris, The Naked Eye: Travels in Search
of the Human Species, is part autobiography, part travelogue and
part presentation on aspects of his theory.
A
charming man, Morris spent most of the hour relating anecdotes from
his travels around the world, including memories of his friends
Anthony Burgess and David Attenborough. The stories amused the audience
and raised a few laughs. One aspect of what he said relating to
his theories interested me particularly. When he started out using
zoological techniques to observe human beings, many people were
critical of his trying to understand humans in the same terms as
other animals. His first bestselling book, The Naked Ape, was written
with the belief that precisely by applying these methods to human
behaviour we could gain some interesting insights into ourselves.
One
audience member asked Morris whether he thought the initial outrage
that he should insult humanity by treating them as animals has today
been reversed, so that we are now seen as inferior to beasts. He
agreed that there had been a disenchantment with humanity so that
any comparison with the rest of nature emphasises our destructiveness
while downplaying our creative acheivements and potential. He misunderstood
the tone of the question, to say he did agree and would like to
think that he had played some small part in undermining man's arrogance
towards the rest of the animal kingdom.
He
spoke very positively of the emergence of ecology, whilst going
on to say he was very optimistic about man's tremendous ingenuity
to work out ways to minimise our impact on the planet. This is a
positive vision in form only, because underneath it lies the assumption
shared with enviromentalists that humans are not special except
inasmuch as they create problems for everything else around us.
He may be positive about our capabilities, but Morris is still no
humanist; that would require a human-centred approach that sets
us above mere beasts. It was interesting to see that the question
posed by The Institute of Ideas debate, What is it to be Human?,
emerging as a theme, if only by implication, in other Edinburgh
International Book Festival talks.
|