culture wars logoarchive about us linkscontactcurrent
archive
about us
links
contact
current

 

 

 

What We Did to Weinstein
Menier Chocolate Factory, London


Michael Caines
posted 28 October 2005

In some ways, What We Did to Weinstein is disappointing - populated by stereotypes, prone to clumsy exposition and unedifying rants - nonetheless, it is also provoking and, in places, powerfully written. Ryan Craig's message is simple, and clearly summed up by the epigraph to the published text of the play, from Milan Kundera: 'Hate traps us by binding us too tightly to our adversary. This is the obscenity of war'.

Craig makes this obscenity obvious even in the structure of the play. He switches suddenly between separate but related incidents, and Tim Supple's direction emphasises the parallels with some smooth, swift transitions between dialogues and scenes that share characters, props or locations. The structure also echoes classical tragedy, beginning as it does with an Israeli officer going over the report of a soldier, Josh, who has committed a 'serious offence' and 'lost control' while patrolling the West Bank. A retrospective account of Josh's life ensues, going far beyond the requirements of explaining Josh's disobedient, catastrophic action. What emerges is a story less about a military than a familial failure. The officer's insistence that he needs to understand Josh quite as well as this is hard to swallow.

Josh is actually a Londoner by birth. His difficult, dying father, Max, is renowned as a writer but estranged from his son in political terms. Josh's girlfriend, Sara, is a conscientious journalist who upsets her own father, Sam, with her forthright reporting on the violent, ongoing conflict in Israel. With convenient symmetry, Sam is both Max's literary agent and his long-time friend. They share an awful secret - something they and their childhood friends did to a certain Weinstein. This gives the play its title. They would be calling it a lesson from history, were it not suppressed and therefore tragically unheeded.

Around these Jewish characters, Craig neatly arranges the story of Yasmin, Max's nurse, and her brother, Tariq, who spits hatred at materialist Westerners and threatens a bloody revenge. Briefly, there is story of the man Josh takes prisoner on the West Bank, a Palestinian called Yusef, who may or may not be a terrorist. (The excellent Pushpinder Chani plays both Tariq and Yusef, chilling as one and charming as the other.) There is even a lovely encounter with an English skinhead, who despises the 'backward culture' of immigrants, but does not see himself as discriminating unfairly: 'How can I be a racialist if I'm prepared to shag a Paki?'

Deliberately or not, Craig refrains from giving his characters much in the way of individualising traits. Instead, they represent degrees on an ethical compass, some pointing to death and destruction, including their own, others holding out for peace. For Craig, it is the group to which each individual belongs that dictates how each encounter turns out, whether it is between skinhead and journalist, writer and agent, or dying Jewish patient and young Muslim nurse. Perhaps this is beside the point.

Craig seems more concerned with the clash between strong, rival beliefs, and, in a sense, with guilt. Sam calls the Weinstein incident a 'disgrace', a crime for which he must take a share of the responsibility: 'We have to face what we did'. He confronts it by writing a story about it. Equally involved, Max baulks at publishing this, in spite of his eagerness to get his hands on something new by the great writer. At this point, the play starts to warm up, with Leonard Fenton as Sam and Harry Towb as Max giving credible performances as men who have grown old under the shadow a shameful secret. Likewise, Fenton and Miranda Pleasence as Sara share a sharply observed, funny scene early on, as a father and his distressingly independent-minded daughter. Given to drink, casual sex and defensive sarcasm, Pleasence's character is far from perfect, however, and it is not her principles but her lack of them that destroys her relationship with Josh.

One of the best scenes has her and Josh meeting again after their relationship is over, to shout half-affectionately at one another in a nightclub. Competing with the relentless beat, Josh somehow manages to confess to his problem - 'I don't know what it is, but I've had this feeling for a long time. A really long time. I'm incredibly angry. All the time. Just extremely angry.' But Sara has a date, and has to go.

Josh Cohen has perhaps the most demanding role in What We Did to Weinstein; the fictional Josh requires the actor Josh to go from blank-eyed military prisoner to decent, younger civilian and back again. Along the way, Cohen is funny (dealing with an obstreperous father), brash (getting in a fight with Tariq) and confused (Sara runs rings round him in their arguments). It is just that it is hard to believe that Josh (the character, but the actor, too, for that matter) runs on extreme anger all the time. In any case, Supple, Craig and company have succeeded in delivering a forceful and challenging play. The obscenity of war is clear, even if its victims' individuality is not.


Till 12 November 2005

 

 
All articles on this site © Culture Wars.