|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Andrew Haydon
|
||
|
In theory Instructions
for Modern Living should be great. The two performers (New Zealand
writer/performer Duncan Sarkies and musician Nic McGowan) enter and
sit amidst a cluster of hi-tech gadgetry, microphones, a sound desk,
keyboard, video camera and laptop. There’s even a xylophone and
a theremin.
A live-feed video projection starts up. Sure, cynics could happily dismiss
this approach as ‘avant-garde by numbers’ and namecheck
everyone from the Woosters or Throbbing Gristle through to Katie Mitchell,
but then if you’re making a certain sort of work, the stage is
going to look a certain way. Sarkies starts
talking slowly into his microphone about a ghost who lives in his flatshare.
His companion starts playing slow melodic keyboard music. The video
projection fades from the musician to an unwavering shot of a clapboard
house. The commentary goes on. And on. One senses the audience asking
themselves if they could actually endure 85 minutes of this. Then, after
an agonising ten minutes a new section starts. This one is a bit faster,
more upbeat, it also features Sarkies neatly using a pitch-shifter on
the microphone allowing him to talk in voices pitched higher or lower
than his own. He does both halves of a conversation between two blokes
in a pub - or maybe its a guy and a girl - who are talking about racism
in Britain, and how it’s worse than racism in New Zealand. This
is a good deal more interesting than the ghost bit, but not terribly
acute or incisive. Scenes continue to change, hopping between the solo
monologue and these solo duologues. There’s one which, as well
as having the high voice and the low voice, also has Sarkies doing accents
and the computer providing the atmospheric crackle and white noise of
the radios used to talk to the Apollo space missions. All the while McGowan
plods through his tunes, making much use of a loop sampler that allows
him to record what he’s playing and then start playing new bits
over the top, building each section’s accompaniment into quite
a bulk of sound. Annoyingly, these all sound very similar, with the
various layers turning up in much the same order every time, so that
after a while one’s patience starts to wear a bit thin. Then there’s
the content of Sarkies’ text – the pages of which he throws
to the floor once they are done, so the audience can see precisely how
many pages are left – it is downbeat, not especially acute and
generally offers precious little insight or hope. His vision of the
world, unless he is being ironic – in which case he might want
to flag it up a bit so was can all enjoy the joke – is pretty
much that capitalism sucks and we are all powerless. Beyond this; our
personal lives suck, and no one is very happy. Men and women don’t
get on. All we can look forward to is dead end jobs and loveless marriages.
The overall effect is like listening to a nasal weasel complain bitterly
for 80 minutes to the slower songs from Air’s Moon Safari.
|
||
|