Friday 9 January 2009

Responsibility in popular culture

Role Models (2008), directed by David Wain

Upon seeing the cast list for Role Models, it would not be unfair to make any number of assumptions about the likely narrative and strain of comedy to expect from the film. The guy in a rut / quarter-life crisis, working in ‘some brainless job, no goals, no ambition’ who, in a chance encounter, finds the foundations of his cushioned life shaken into adulthood. Along the way the charming protagonist encounters some hilarious and likely crude scenarios only to be met with a final pivotal choice of action, which inevitably will result in him proving his new worth, whilst simultaneously teaching the self-righteous grown-ups around him to remember their own child within – cue kiss, funky music and credits. 

Role Models follows the story of Danny (Paul Rudd) and Wheeler (Seann William Scott) whose simple yet unsatisfying lives selling energy drinks to children is disrupted when Danny loses his girlfriend and momentarily his mind, damaging the property of a client school. Danny’s now ex-girlfriend Beth (Elizabeth Banks) is a lawyer who manages to keep them out of jail on the condition that they each carry out 150 hours of community service with the mentorship program ‘Sturdy Wings’, run by intense ex-addict Sweeny (Jane Lynch). Assigned the two most difficult cases within the program, which include foul-mouthed ten year old Ronnie (Bobb’e J. Thompson) and nerdy teen Augie (Christopher Mintz-Plasse), both Danny and Wheeler work through their own hang-ups and various outlandish scenarios to eventually give confidence to Augie, breakthrough to the softer side of Ronnie, gain respect from Sweeny and of course win Beth back for Danny.

Using many of the Frat Pack thespian discoveries, Role Models does slide comfortably among the numerous R-rated comedies which have kept so many of us chortling for around ten years now. But is it possible that its title references a new self-reflexive understanding of films’ responsibility in popular culture (dare I mention that word ‘responsibility’)? In producing Role Models, is its team stating an attitude to the throne they now sit on?

To answer, or even ask these questions, suggests that the likes of director David Wain, the team of producers and executive producers and stars Seann William Scott and Paul Rudd (who also contributed to the screenplay) actually see the throne I refer to. That they are aware of the new strain of dialogue, mannerisms, jokes and behaviour that Frat Pack films have introduced to popular culture, they acknowledge their power and role within those aspects of our time. They have enhanced the notion that the goofy geek is also cool, that the thirty-something stoner is tolerable and of course the best of the adages: that everyone has the capacity to achieve. In condoning these approaches, mainstream adults and other over-achievers are consistently shown up as the true social losers.

It is the opinion of this humble writer that film serves not only as social barometer but, to varying degrees, as social dictator. Watching Role Models, the hope that the aforementioned self-reflexivity was going to be served persisted. Albeit outside of the Apatow canon, but with many of his minions and colleagues involved, this movie was going to be full of the intelligent social commentary these film-makers are so capable of. Without preaching and through an everyday metaphor, it was going to show that even they, as film-makers and actors, have to work extremely hard to get the production and the comedy to the screen. Alas, it turned out not to be so.

The film ticks each required box and no more. For R-rated comedy quirks: the consistently amazing Jane Lynch and Jen Yeong. For shock factor humour: the foul-mouthed Seann William Scott is teamed with Bobb’e J. Thompson. For quarter-life crisis good guy and sensible but sexy girlfriend: Paul Rudd and Elizabeth Banks. Peculiar and unsatisfying career: energy drink salesmen. Madcap scenario instigating catalyst: punishment which must be endured ending up being the best lesson you never thought they would learn; snappy banter, some dressing up for laughs, male bonding that no one can resist, and the list goes on. The film is as funny and charming as any others of its genre. Yet again the formula has worked but unfortunately, as with its protagonists, has not reached its full potential as a multi-layered comedy with the capacity to comment on its own role in the society it serves.

Opportunities for character exploration through Augie’s world of battle re-enactment, or the source of Ronnie’s adult vocabulary, not to mention their respective families, are left sadly unattended beyond Augie’s utterance: ‘In this world I don’t have to be me’. Obvious and clichéd as this may be, it is not this lack of ingenuity that is disappointing (this genre never promised us challenges). Considering the insight into outsider mentality that films such as Superbad (2007), 40-Year-Old Virgin (2005) and even Knocked Up (2007) have provided, it is unfortunate that Wain and Co. did not to pay more attention to authenticity or sentimentality in the characters, which their acting team would have been readily capable of executing. Particularly in the context of this anecdote of father figures, a narrative rife with prospects for emotion amidst the humour and commentary on the status of this genre’s role model status, there is a gaping hole where this leeway lies.

The closest this film comes to self-reflexivity is when the spirited little Ronnie leaps at an innocent Augie with flying punches for no apparent reason after having seen Danny and Wheeler beating each other up. Not only is there no follow-up to this, but the film continues on its merry way with crass abuse and ‘friendly’ punches aplenty. Redemption and realisation does not come to Danny and Wheeler in relation to their lazy and childish lifestyles, but in their ability to adapt these unchanged attitudes to a form of wisdom suitable to their young lieges. They have bonded with other ‘non-achievers’ (for want of a better word) but neither by maturing themselves nor acknowledging the effect their personalities have on the world around them. If anything, their brand of acumen is adopted to varying degrees by those around them who roll their eyes and smile at those wacky lads who’ll never change, but you gotta love ‘em.

And so continues the education that Wain, Rudd, Scott, Apatow, Banks, Rogen, Hill, Cera, Mintz-Plasse et al, choose to brand wherein one can be inconsiderate, unhealthy, beer-swilling, weed-smoking, potty-mouthed, sexist – as long as you’re kind and charming your wits will carry you through anything and will see you end up on top: the job, the girl, the laughs. As someone who thoroughly enjoys these narrative arcs and this formula of comedy, my only concern after having seen Role Models is, how long it will last. When will the jokes cease to be funny and the geeks stop being charming and the four-letter words simply run out? If a film with the potential of Role Models did not take it to a newer, fresher level then, even in their duty as examples to the aspiring film-makers of today, they perhaps have much more work to do.


Film

Enjoyed this article? Share it with others.

Resources

The Times BFI 53rd London Film Festival

Internet Movie Database
IMDB - does exactly what it says on the tin

BFI
British Film Institute’s Finest

BFI’s Sight and Sound
World cinema eating its heart out

They shoot pictures, don’t they?
Dedicated to the art of directing

Barbican Film
Some of the most innovative films in town

ICA Film
Independent, political and art-house gorge-fest

National Media Museum
Not nearly as bad as it sounds

Like what you see? - keep it that way, support Culture Wars online review.